Toronto Life - The Informer

Insider intel on the politics and personalities shaping the city. Sign up for Preview newsletter for weekly updates

Features

7 Comments

The Real World: how Toronto is cashing in on the reality TV boom

Reality television is booming in Toronto; nearly 100 shows are made here every year—some of them drawing more viewers than (gasp) hockey. Call it an affront to good taste or appointment TV, it’s the future of Canadian entertainment

The Real World
Every Wednesday last fall, a friend of mine invited a bunch of us over to her Front Street apartment to watch The Bachelor Canada. The star was Brad Smith, a broad-shouldered himbo tasked with choosing a wife from a harem of 25 tanned, bleach-toothed beauties, including a former Playboy bunny and a Miss Universe contestant. We rated the questionable appeal of the contenders and cringed as they performed awkward cabaret routines or competed in lumber­jack competitions to prove their marriage potential. During the solemn rose ceremonies, when Brad sent home our favourites, we shouted expletives at the TV. My friend also hosts parties for a handful of other reality series. We consume these shows the way sports fans watch Leafs games—screaming “Oh my god!” in glorious, cathartic unison.

In this era of downloading, streaming and TV-on-demand, reality shows have become appointment television, and Toronto is cashing in. Nearly 100 of them were made here last year, collectively targeting every conceivable TV pleasure centre: sleaze (Big Brother Canada, with its lecherous housemates and salacious showmances), camp (Golden Gays, a Slice series about gay retirees in Palm Springs) and schadenfreude (shelter shows like Property Virgins, in which couples with tiny budgets scour the Toronto housing market).

In the 2011-2012 TV season, the genre poured $297 million into the Canadian economy, up 30 per cent from the previous year. The vast majority of that revenue was generated here in the city by three production companies—Insight, Cineflix and Proper Television—that develop both original programming and Canadian versions of established U.S. shows, like the homegrown edition of The Amazing Race. Produced by Insight, The Amazing Race Canada debuted in July to the largest audience in the history of Canadian television: three million people—one in three English-speaking Canadians—tuned in.

For production companies and networks, these shows are profit machines: they’re cheap to produce and almost guarantee huge ratings. An episode of Buying and Selling, a popular house-hunting show on the W Network, for example, costs just $230,000 per episode and draws 2.8 million viewers. The average hour of scripted television, meanwhile, costs around $1.5 million. And sometimes a lot more: The Borgias—a Canadian co-produced Renaissance drama starring Jeremy Irons and featuring enough brocade and candlelit nudity to populate a museum’s worth of Botticelli frescoes—came in at roughly $5 million per episode. Yet only 500,000 people watched each week. And, in a CanCon coup certain to have fiscal conservatives crying gravy, reality production companies in Ontario can get tax credits for 35 per cent of their labour costs under the Ontario Media Development Corporation, which makes Toronto a particularly affordable place to produce reality TV. Plus, the city happens to be home to hundreds of talented, well-trained documentary filmmakers struggling in a shrinking industry. Reality TV is their honey pot—they’re mastering the dark arts of faux-candid footage, commercial-break cliffhangers and tearful exit interviews.

Through means both noble and nefarious, TV watchers have been downloading their favourite shows for years, yet it’s only recently that their numbers have become traceable. Social media analytics companies like Trendrr and Canada’s Seevibes have started measuring the success of shows in terms of social engagement. They calibrate what they call second-screen activity—every tweet, Facebook like and Downton Abbeyoncé Tumblr post—in order to quantify that amorphous alchemy known as buzz. In 2012, Trendrr reported that reality TV and sports were the subjects of half of all online conversations about TV. And of the top 10 most buzzed-about shows, five were reality series: The X-Factor, The Voice, American Idol, Love and Hip Hop: Atlanta (about a clique of rappers’ girlfriends) and The Bad Girls Club (in which seven women of questionable psychological stability are locked in a house together for optimal cat-fighting).

The shift toward social TV is saving an industry in crisis. In the 2010-2011 season, Canadian private broadcasters such as Global, CityTV and CTV made $152 million in advertising revenue. A year later, that number plummeted to $23 million. Advertisers that used to buy up 30-second spots for $30,000 are now moving those dollars into social media campaigns and online video. The networks are scrambling to capture and leverage that online audience. In June, both Bell Media (which owns CTV, MuchMusic, TSN and Discovery Canada) and Shaw (which owns Global, Slice, Showcase, History Canada and Food Network Canada) partnered with Twitter, so that when a brand buys a TV spot, the sponsorship also pops up each time someone tweets a clip of the show.

  • gg

    The most annoying aspect of the home-reno/real estate show produced in Canada is that they are very vague with the locations of the houses. Instead of naming a specific neighbourhood, they’ll use a euphemistic “up-and-coming neighbourhood”. It is beyond irritating. The theory is that they try to keep it as unspecific as possible to make it more palatable for foreign broadcasters, which is just total and utter BS. (The same can be said of all the recent cop shows being produced here in Toronto.) House Hunters in the States will always name the neighbourhood the houses that are featured, even when they are located in smaller locales. I don’t think anyone outside of Texas and Aggies fans could be able to name a ‘hood in College Station, TX, yet HGTV US doesn’t seem to mind.

  • disqus_fKr9wd6cT8

    It makes perfect sense though as a business model to produce television that a broader audience can relate to whether it’s for US, international or regional markets here in Canada. This isn’t Community Television after all and even Canada’s biggest shows operate under a fraction of the budgets it’s US counterparts do. This revenue from foreign sales is essential to recoup production costs. Broad relatability is a key component of the equation along with protecting participant’s privacy in terms of where they live.

  • disqus_fKr9wd6cT8

    This topic is easy bait for people who want to equate the word ‘reality’ with reality. The genre isn’t documentary nor is it journalism. Everyone knows that Reality Television is in fact (Produced) Reality Television. It’s just not as catchy sounding this way.
    Get over it and enjoy the entertainment. There’s no conspiracy.

  • Terry Towel

    Come Dine With Me Canada is suppose to only feature (in their words) five amateur chefs. But they have used professional chef working in the field as contestants.

  • Chloe

    I watch the Property Brothers all the time. It is no secret that (1) Jonathan has a crew that does all the work (even though he does swing that sledge hammer once in a while!). You can SEE the construction crew doing the work. And (2) re Drew. He makes it look as though he is doing the work, but the viewers are not that stupid. He is more like the “go-between” between the actual realtors doing the sale and negotiations. Whether he does the work or not, Jonathan does point out things that people interested in doing renos should pay attention to (yeah, don’t buy a house unless you check the electrical!). And it seems some people don’t, which brings me to…..

    Love It Or List It. You can tell Hillary and David are reading off a script, especially Hillary. I watched a new episode this week and the house they were asked to reno was in horrible shape. And Hillary did admit the house was a mess. It didn’t take an expert to realize there were so many problems with the house that the measly budget the owners gave Hillary were NEVER going to fix the problems. Hence, the drama comes in.

  • Arthur Richardson

    the cougar baiting show is a big scam, a good friend of mine got conned into being a participant. the film company signs the contestants up at their own expense to the bogus website cougarlife.com to make it look like its actually got real guys on it. all the contestants should get together and sue the company that perpetrated this hoax

  • likalaruku

    As long as the construction is real, I don’t care if the shows on HGTVV are scripted. In fact, knowing that the stubborn incompatible couples are reading off scripts & aren’t really married restores some of my faith in human intelligence.

    Jonathan has long hair? That’s a good one. It doesn’t even come close to touching his shoulders.

 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement