Toronto Life

Advertisement

Sitting Ducks

Chefs prize it and diners crave it, but entire countries have banned it. Is foie gras really so wrong? There was only one way to find out By Sasha Chapman

Come 'n' get it: at eight weeks old, Aux Champs d'Élisé's ducks are moved to the second of three barns, where they are trained to gorge themselves Come 'n' get it: at eight weeks old, Aux Champs d'Élisé's ducks are moved to the second of three barns, where they are trained to gorge themselves
Image credit: Pierre Manning

Except for the cooling fans, which blow a steady six-kilometre wind through the barn, it’s eerily quiet in here. Even as the gaveur turns on a bank of fluorescent lights, 2,000 ducks rise to their feet without a quack, each stretching its neck out the top of its eight-inch-wide wire cage. Some of the moulards are pale white, others have patches of black. Most are male—male ducks are especially prized at the table—and mute through an accident of breeding.

The gaveur, André Couture, is a kindly looking white-haired man in large square glasses and clean white cotton gloves. He acts like a visiting chaplain or nurse, patting the birds’ stomachs gently to check that their last meal was properly digested, and handling them with careful dispatch. Then he looks to his boss, Élisé François, for the go-ahead. What comes next is shocking, at least to a city slicker: Couture quickly pulls the first bird’s head toward him, extending its neck from the cage. He drags a shiny metal pipe across the bird’s open beak before thrusting it into the animal’s mouth and pushing it six inches down the duck’s slender neck, into its esophagus. Stabilizing the bird’s neck with one hand, he uses the other to pull the trigger on the pneumatic pump, injecting a warm, sticky mass of cornmeal (a few cups’ s wings (with indignation?) before quickly settling into its cage, and Couture moves on to the next in line.

François and his team of nine gaveurs have been force-feeding ducks for more than a decade at Aux Champs d’Élisé. The farm, in Marieville, Quebec, produces foie gras for some of the best chefs in North America, from Marc Thuet of Bistro & Bakery Thuet and Keith Froggett of Scaramouche to Gray Kunz of Café Gray in New York. Force-feeding ducks and geese is the only way to produce foie gras (translation: fatty liver), the delicate, butter-smooth lux­ury so beloved by chefs and gourmands. Though there have been considerable advances over the past few millenniums, the basic principles of gavage still hold: ducks and geese are stuffed with an energy-rich diet two or three times a day for the last two weeks before slaughter, so that their livers swell, on average, to more than half a kilogram, or 10 to 12 times their normal size.

Until quite recently, foie gras was a rare treat, even in France, where 80 per cent of the world’s supply is produced and consumed. It was the sort of thing a family ate just once a year, for réveillon, Christmas Eve. But its popularity has ballooned over the past decade, and now, in Toronto—as in most cosmopolitan North American cities—just about any restaurant with an ambitious menu offers foie gras, pan-seared and melting or as pâté, throughout the year.

Lately, though, the delicacy has drawn nearly as much controversy as it has culinary acclaim. Whole countries, from Italy to Israel, have banned the stuff, and debate is heating up south of the border. Paul Shapiro is the director of the campaign against factory farming at the Humane Society of the United States. He calls force-feeding “one of the most egregious practices used by factory farmers,” and contends foie gras should be seen for what it is: an organ that is grossly swollen and diseased. Superstar American chefs such as Charlie Trotter have renounced fatty livers, and last summer Chicago banned its sale and production. California also passed a ban, which takes effect in 2012—enough time, one presumes, for overindulged Beverly Hills gourmands to be weaned. New Jersey, home to the largest foie gras wholesaler, and New York state, from which most of the U.S. supply originates, are considering similar legislation. A ban could force U.S. producers north. Quebec, the centre of Canadian foie gras production, might soon be the last bastion in North America.

But is force-feeding wrong? Does the practice cause pain or suffering in the birds? And if it does—to take a utilitarian tack—is the suffering any worse than what factory farming routinely inflicts on most of the livestock raised in North America? My annual Christmas terrine was starting to prick my conscience. Which is how I wound up standing in a barn full of ducks, waiting my turn to try my hand at gavage.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

TEST Originally published January 2007

Comments

Sitting Ducks

Please note that neither Sasha Chapman nor Toronto Life necessarily agree with the comments posted below. Toronto Life reserves the right to edit or delete comments. Read our full policy

You must have a Torontolife.com account to post comments. If you do not have an account you can register now.

Demonica_Erotica January 4, 20071

There is a lot to comment on but I suppose I will make this short. Is there really something wrong with making other species suffer just because we like the way they taste? I would think any rational, compassionate human being would think so.....if they changed their perspective. Factory farming of any animal is not the "food chain." That is a poor justitfication for what we do to them. I commend the writer for having doubts about fois gras, and also agree that there are other forms of factory farming cruelties out there. They are all bad, but some are just a little more disturbing then others, and for me fois gras is one of them.
We eat them because we like to and that's the bottom line. We definitely do not need to, so as long as the industry and consumers continue to try and rationalize systematic abuse as OK, they will continue to be protested against.


hynikken January 6, 20072

Please point me to your fridge... Would be a shame to let it go to waste.


dee12345 January 9, 20073

I am deeply disturbed by this article depicting what these geese have to go through on a daily basis. Are you doing the article to promote animal cruelty? That is what it sounds like, and it is also the main reason many countries have banned foie gras!

I do not like the idea of a company promoting animal cruelty so deliberately. I hope in the future that you will reconsider posting such articles.


arianah January 22, 20074

This article is ridiculous. Did the author even attempt to talk to anyone other than the foie gras producers themselves? If she had, she might have learned that the rate of mortality on foie gras is twenty times that of conventional duck farming.

She might have learned that the reason the ducks are panting is that their hugely-enlarged livers are pressing against their air sacs, making it impossible for them to breathe without pain. She might have learned that the ducks' feathers look like crap because they are so sick that they cannot preen themselves. She might have learned that death via liver disease or asphixiation-- the fate of many foie gras ducks -- is a horribly unpleasant way to die.

Even so, it doesn't even take in-depth research or analysis to realize that inducing liver failure in an animal can never be done humanely. If the ducks are so eager for their force feeding, as the author seems to suggest, then why must they even be force fed at all? Why not let them gorge themselves into oblivion? The answer is obvious: No animal would willingly gorge itself to the point of death, to the point where its breathing and mobility is severely comprised, as is the case with foie gras ducks.

How about a little bit more objectivity next time? Where are the photos of the panting ducks with crappy-looking feathers or the ones that have died from the force feeding with food spilling out of their beaks? This is shoddy, one-sided reporting at best.


1000 October 27, 20075

What a disgusting, one-sided, ignorant article! Has anyone really seen what goes on on a foie gras farm when no one is watching? Here, indulge yourselves:

http://www.farmsanctuary.org/actionalert...

The author of this article has clearly no compassion in her heart. How else can she possibly accept all those free products after witnessing such savage cruelty?
Canadians are an apathetic bunch when it comes to cruelty to animals, especially "food" animals. Who the hell are we to inflict such suffering on other living creatures, especially for a product that is absolutely unnecessary? Quebec is so proud of their French tradition...if this is tradition, it sucks.
I won't be reading Toronto Life any more. The reporting is ridiculous.


Sitting Ducks comments RSS Feed [?]

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:


Follow Toronto Life on Twitter, Facebook and via RSS

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Contests
Most shared stories today

Advertisement