A Mighty Wind
The city has visions of a large-scale wind farm off our shoreline. And how could anyone in 21st-century Toronto be opposed? Ask the people of Scarborough By Andrew Westoll
The big bluff: Hydro kept Guildwood residents guessing
about its wind farm ambitions
Image credit: Illustration by Ben Weeks; photo from
iStockPhoto
The village of Guildwood, in southeast Scarborough, is home to some of the more stunning vistas in the city. Viewed from a perch high up on the Scarborough Bluffs, Lake Ontario stretches out like a shimmering mirage. To the east and west, the Bluffs peel back into a dramatic exposition of nature’s force, centuries of wind, rain, ice and snow having pummelled the cliffs gradually northward. Near their lip is some of the most sought-after real estate in Toronto; far below, their eroded faces crumble into a rugged lakeshore.
The heart and soul of Guildwood is the Guild Inn. The Guild had a short life before and after World War II as a progressive artists’ colony, a place where freethinkers could escape the soulless, capitalist strivings of downtown Toronto to embrace creativity, gaze down upon a calming stretch of lake and wander rural Scarborough in peace. Today, although the Guild is little more than a sorry collection of dilapidated buildings, its legacy lives on. Guildwood residents still pride themselves on standing up to abuses of power, perceived or otherwise, and on a strong naturalist ethic that is uniquely tied to the Bluffs.
Lately, they’ve galvanized around a shared hatred of Toronto Hydro and its plans. The city-owned corporation is preparing to survey the winds that blow offshore, a study that involves anchoring a small steel platform to the lake bed between two and four kilometres out. Rising from this platform will be an anemometer, an instrument that measures wind speed and direction using light-imaging radar. Including a power source, a communication system and navigation lights, the whole contraption will be five metres wide by eight metres tall and is unlikely to be visible from the shore.
If the winds prove strong and reliable enough, Hydro will begin drawing up plans for something more ambitious: a large-scale wind farm. They chose the site because it has a 15-metre-deep underwater shelf running parallel to the land, making it one of the few feasible areas off our shoreline for turbine installation. The farm would likely stretch for 25 kilometres along the eastern lakefront, from east of Ashbridge’s Bay to Ajax. By some estimates, it would cost upward of $500 million to build and bring on-line. The turbine towers—perhaps 60 of them, each 90 metres tall—would be drilled into the lake bed. Together, and at full capacity, they could generate approximately 180 megawatts of electricity, enough to power 47,000 homes. This energy could be pumped directly into the GTA’s power grid, avoiding the significant costs involved in long-distance transmission.
Given the social climate out there—hell, given the actual climate out there—one might expect Torontonians to be ecstatic about this. We live in a province that recently introduced into its legislature the Green Energy and Green Economy Act, a landmark bill aimed at making Ontario a leader in clean, renewable energy. David Miller is the chair of the C40, an international group of cities united in the fight against global warming. And Dalton McGuinty has committed to phasing out all coal-fired power plants in Ontario by 2014.
But in Guildwood, Hydro’s little wind study has resulted in a firestorm of anger, controversy and near-tribal levels of contempt. A small, organized group is determined to quash Toronto’s first large-scale residential renewable energy project.
The prevailing wisdom of the post–Al Gore era is that “going green” is never as easy as the cutesy phrase suggests. City councils and municipal power utilities around the world are learning that although the buzzwords “sustainable” and “renewable” are political winners, voters’ good intentions don’t necessarily translate into taxpayer support—especially when it comes to wind projects. In most cases, the government and its wind energy partners face a long battle before the grid turns green.
As some European cities have learned, citizen buy-in is key. Copenhagen’s Middelgrunden offshore wind farm, located just off the city’s harbour, has been remarkably well received, thanks to a strong public information campaign and an innovative ownership strategy. When they first heard about the project, residents were worried about their view of the harbour, the farm’s impact on aquatic life, low-frequency noise pollution and potential disruptions to the shipping industry, among other things. To alleviate their concerns, the city undertook a comprehensive environmental assessment and included residents in every step of the process. They even organized a field trip to another wind farm, which eliminated fears about noise. (Later studies also dealt with the concern about migratory birds—which, clever beings that they are, tend to avoid wind turbines, as do ships.) It was eventually agreed that the turbines would be placed three kilometres from shore and laid out in an arc, thus mirroring the shape of the historic defences surrounding the city.
3 Comments
Comment on this story
Neither Andrew Westoll nor Toronto Life necessarily agree with the comments posted here. Editors will not correct spelling or grammar. Toronto Life reserves the right to edit or delete comments entirely. Read our full policy
Some articles on this site require that you have a Torontolife.com account in order to comment, and this is one of them. If you do not have an account, you can register now.


I used to love kayaking, beach combing and hiking in the bluffs. But that was before I became 'green' like Dalton. Now I am all about ditching my hiking boots, my mtn bike and my little boat and watching my 52inch LCD TV. I'll be using up my 2000 watts a day playing video games and watching those great nature shows on Nat Geo. I agree with McGuinty and Smitherman. We need watts for all our stuff people!! If you want a real natural high, just save up your carbon credits and fly to a city that chose not to take a dump on its most pristine natural feature. That's what I'm gonna do. The Earth rocks!
April 14, 2009 | by NIMBY65Build the windfarm.
People need to get over their precious, stupid, ignorant NIMBY selves.
Laforet: “If Hydro can’t even organize a simple community meeting, how can they be expected to manage a project of this scale?”
What a ludicrous meaningless comment.
And the 200 watt challenge is ridiculous for countries with winters like Canada or Scandinavia.
April 15, 2009 | by P88I still don't understand the people like Laforet - Toronto Hydro has tried to engage them already 3 time, and all they do is show up and yell. Hydro has been giving them answers, just not ones they like. If they would just calm down and have a civilized discussion, I'm sure things would have gone better. All of this angst may be for nothing if the wind resource assessment finds there isn't enough wind. Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill!
As to the 2000 watt challenge, not all of your household wattage is taken up by heat - many of our homes are heated by natural gas, so cold winters are not necessarily an excuse. I would expect that Scandinavian countries still use less wattage than we do in North America. Turn down your a/c, hang your laundry to dry in the summer, turn off your lights, get rid of the 30-year old beer fridge in your basement, unplug appliances when not in use - there are hundreds of easy little things you can do that will reduce how much electricity you use on a daily basis. While we may not get down to 2000 watts, I'm positive we can come down from 12,000. Consider this: most European homes don't even have a dryer, just a washer!
April 15, 2009 | by Maurynna