Advertisement

Toronto Life - The Wire

The comprehensive index of every blog post, magazine story and restaurant review that appears on Torontolife.com

Urban Decoder

Comments

I read that Ontario has a surplus of pigs. Can I adopt one as a pet?

Interest in pigs as pets surged recently when a crate of orphaned oinkers was dropped at Dalton McGuinty’s office, along with a sign reading “Due to misnaming an influenza ‘Swine Flu,’ our industry has been devastated…” The anonymous piglet abandoner is referring to record losses recently experienced by Ontario’s 2,767 hog farmers. A year ago, pork was the mainstay of every bistro worth its fleur de sel, but H1N1 has curbed our appetite for all things swiney. Unfortunately, city dwellers are barred from taking in the little trotters. Back in the mid-’90s, pigs were the pet par excellence, thanks in part to George Clooney and his pot-bellied companion (RIP Max Clooney, 1988–2006). Yet many Clooney wannabes didn’t account for the fact that their chihuahua-size friend would grow to exceed 150 pounds, relentlessly uproot lawns and pee more often than a kid on a road trip. The rejected pets ended up on foster farms, and in 1998 Toronto’s newly amalgamated Animal Services put the kibosh on domesticated porkers (also banned: ant­eaters, elephants and mongooses). If a Wilbur to call your own is still too much to resist, it could be time to consider greener pastures. Persons living in any of Toronto’s designated agricultural areas (Riverdale Farm, for example) are free to go hog wild.

• Question from Dave Kimball, Yorkdale

Wondering about the waterfront? Curious about construction? Perplexed by politics? Ask the Urban Decoder a question here.

Urban Decoder

2 Comments

I was in Montreal recently and used the city’s bike sharing program. Please tell me Toronto is getting something similar.

For the uninitiated, Montreal’s excellent bike share program, which kicked into high gear this year, is called Bixi. It’s a municipal public transit service, invented in Quebec, that links 400 solar-powered rental stations and an armada of 5,000 two-wheelers. By swiping a credit card, riders can un-dock a bike at point A and re-dock at point B, with an interactive map of docking stations accessible by cellphone. The first half-hour of freewheeling is free for subscribers (more non-committal cyclists pay a $5 access fee), followed by a charge of $1.50 for the next half-hour, $3 for the next and so on. And unlike the infamous single-speed yellow beaters from Toronto’s previous bike share experiment, Bixi’s sturdy aluminum cycles are designed for heavy urban use. The operation is gaining traction among pedal-positive municipal planners globally: this summer, the people from Bixi snagged contracts with Boston and London (England). As for Toronto, if all goes as planned, we’ll be whistling Bixi by May, with full implementation downtown by summer 2010. Current plans call for approximately 3,000 bikes and 450 docking stations, with monthly subscriptions around $28. The city is also looking at selling ad space to defray a hefty $15-million startup cost, rather than shifting the cost onto taxpayers, which ought to reduce fuming on multiple fronts.

• Question from Elise Alexander, St. Clair West

Urban Decoder

Comments

My neighbours host parties every weekend and blare music all night. What can I do to stop the racket permanently?

If earplugs and the 5-0 have failed to silence the Ibizathons next door, you can sue the boisterous bastards. Sort of. Because noise is regulated by a municipal bylaw, it’s the city (rather than the police) that can really give your neighbours the what-for—a slow, bureaucratic, moderately effective what-for. Complaints can be filed with the district office. An inspec­tor will open a formal investigation and issue a written notification to the offender by mail. Should that be ignored, you’ll be asked to complete a noise log (e.g., “10/09/09. 3:05 a.m. Hyena-like laughter. ‘Groove Is in the Heart’ on repeat.”). You’ll then have to face your noisy nemeses in court, which pretty much guarantees sidewalk awkwardness on garbage day. The whole process takes about a year, and the typically puny fines (often as little as $100) may not be worth the trouble. Vigilante vengeance may have to compensate for both peace and justice. In the spirit of John Cusack and the U.S. invasion of Panama, the strategic use of some boom box Yanni can send a very strong message.

• Question from Toby Shaw, Beaconsfield

Urban Decoder

Comments

What’s the deal with David Miller’s incredible shrinking waistline?

SkinnyMillerThe secret to Miller’s recent deplumpage is a largely vegetarian diet that basically excludes everything fun and fattening. Like Bill Clinton, who famously gave up Big Macs, Miller was a fast-food junkie. Quarter Pounders with cheese, he says, got him through the 2003 election—and left him pushing 250 pounds. Since then, he’s cut out his daily McD’s fix. In fact, he’s cut out all unhealthy fats and refined sugars. The relentless wine and cheese affairs that come with being mayor require steely willpower, but he resists the call of the canapé by filling up on five protein-rich meals a day (a typical weekday lunch might include chickpea-lentil casserole, plus a handful of almonds). He also now works with a trainer twice a week and runs an average of 12 kilometres three or four times a week. Lately, instead of food, he’s been devouring running books in preparation for a half-mara­thon on September 27. All told, our lean, mean mayoral machine has shed more than 50 pounds. No doubt a Miller Lite campaign slogan is in the works for 2010, though it’s probably safe to assume “Everything you want in a mayor, and less” won’t make the cut.

Question from Angie Stephanopoulos, Riverdale

Urban Decoder

Comments

A fancy store recently charged me five cents for a paper shopping bag. Isn’t the new fee for plastic grocery bags only?

You’re half right. And you could be entitled to a refund. Under the city’s hotly debated bag bylaw, retailers of all kinds—not just grocers—are obliged to charge at least five cents for each plastic bag. Rare exceptions include bags for dry cleaning, bacteria-busting bags for meat or poultry and plastic bags at the pharmacy counter (because disguising one’s Viagra prescription is a God-given right). The rules for paper bags are more complicated. In most cases, store owners can technically charge whatever they want for a paper bag. They could charge you $20, though presumably you’d have the sense to tell them where to stick said pricey sack. The only exception under the new bag bylaw states that if a store can’t provide a five-cent plastic bag, paper bags or boxes must be free. To determine if your store committed a punish­able offence, we’d have to know if there was a plastic alternative. Chances are the clerk who took your nickel was simply making a rookie mistake, but if the “fancy store” was really desperate enough to make an illegal five-cent cash grab, the economy will almost certainly exact your revenge in the near future.

Question from Tara Roberts, Summerhill

Urban Decoder

Comments

If driving and texting is worse than driving drunk, why is it still legal?

DriveTextThe answer, in short, is that it won’t be for long. In April, the provincial government voted to ban all manner of hand-held gadgets behind the wheel, which includes cellphones, PDAs and elec­tronic entertainment devices. ­Following the announcement of the new bylaw, which will come into effect this fall, Car and Driver magazine released a study that compared the length of time it takes to brake when sober, when texting and when drunk. The results: 0.04 extra seconds before hitting the brakes while drunk, versus 0.68 seconds for a texting driver (at standard highway speeds, this translates to a difference of 66 feet). Such findings are particularly unnerving, given the prevalence of the practice; an American survey found that 25 per cent of motorists admitted to DWT, and the figure leaps to almost 60 per cent for drivers between 16 and 19 years old. Circum­stantial evidence further supports the new law: this summer, a Hamilton man ran his car into a median and then a tree while texting. Safe to say he’s not LOLing now.

• Question from Caleb Martin, Mississauga

Wondering about the waterfront? Curious about construction? Perplexed by politics? Ask the Urban Decoder a question here.

Urban Decoder

Comments

The other day, a smoker lit up right beside my eight-month-old on a patio. Isn’t there a law against that?

In the past few years, smoking near wee ones has become as socially unsavoury as bombing around in a Hummer, and neither Obama’s private puffing nor a slick gaggle of Mad Men can bring it back. But while city hall has banned the harmful habit near wading pools and playgrounds, uncovered patios are still fair game, meaning, child or
no child, if you wind up seated near a du Maurier diehard, the options are few. Option 1: Politely ask the offending smokestack to butt out. Many smokers are parents, too, and even those who aren’t will generally be accommodating, provided you ask nicely (snooty insinuations of non-smoker superiority will probably get that “butt out” request thrown right back in your face). Option 2: Find somewhere else to enjoy eating and drinking al fresco. Since 2006, Ontario patios with a roof or an awning are required to be smoke free. Option 3: Ask for a new table—just be willing to pack up if one isn’t available. For the 18 per cent of Canadians who cop to at least the occasional nic fit, patios are one of the few remaining venues at which to seize vice with both hands.

Question from Veronica Hume, The Beach

Wondering about the waterfront? Curious about construction? Perplexed by politics? Ask the Urban Decoder a question here.

Urban Decoder

Comments

Will the new green roof bylaw actually help the environment, or are politicians just trying to get the green vote?

David Miller’s green keenness has indeed been a driving force behind our city’s soon-to-be-instated bylaw, which will require all new buildings with more than 2,000 square metres of floor space to have 20 to 60 per cent plant coverage on the roof. It’s also true that some previous green initiatives—Earth Hour, anyone?—have been more sizzle than steak. But in this case, real benefits abound. Urban vegetation acts like
a set of lungs that filter out pollution, and with more than 50 million square feet of plant-friendly roof surface in Toronto, the initiative should serve as a major smog buster. Green roofs could also bring down temperatures by a few degrees (though this may seem less of a bonus after a June that felt more like October). Plus, there are the culinary perks—like growing rooftop radicchio. All in all, a pretty good package, unless you’re in the condo biz. Predictably, developers are balking at the extra costs, but when the bylaw takes effect next February, they’ll have to go green or cough up the green—even if they can muster a damn good reason for being granted an exemption, every square metre that stays plant free will cost them $200.

• Question from Vera Zuck, Lawrence Park

Urban Decoder

Comments

I hear Toronto recently got its first ombudsman, which has me wondering, Why now? And what exactly does an ombudsman do?

First the why. In 2006, the provincial government passed the City of Toronto Act, which gave Ontario’s capital a whole whack of new powers. Of course, with great power (or in this case, the power to distribute four different sizes of recycling bins) comes great responsibility, which is why the act stipulates that the city employ an ombudsman. The reason we’re just getting one now can be chalked up to the standard snail’s pace at which all things city hall tend to operate. Now the what. You may be oblivious to the ins and outs of the “o” word, but you’re not alone. According to our first ombudsman, Fiona Crean, a surprising number of high-level professionals are unfamiliar with the term. If it sounds more like a new IKEA product than a job title, that may be because it is, in fact, Swedish. Loosely translated, it means “representative of the people” and describes an appointed person who investigates public complaints against administrative bodies. Thus far, Crean and her team have fielded gripes from more than 250 citizens, wielding some demi-superhero powers—issuing subpoenas, searching city offices—in order to recommend policy and practice changes to city council. In short, this is one busy woman, so before troubling her with minor peeves (such as garbage collectors who leave potato peels in the bottom of the green bin), picky citizens should start by contacting the department that’s done them wrong. The ombudsman, says Crean, is the office of last resort.

• Question from Olivia Forrest, Richmond Hill

Wondering about the waterfront? Curious about construction? Perplexed by politics? Ask the Urban Decoder a question here.

Urban Decoder

Comments

Can you give me the final word on sandals at work: yea or nay?

sandals

The proper sandal etiquette depends entirely, of course, on where you work. If you’re a lawyer subject to one of Bay Street’s essay-length dress codes, sandals constitute a serious breach, even if they’re made of stingray skin and cost more than a family sedan. On the other hand, if your place of work is über-relaxed or über–fashion forward (last year’s gladiators were a must for budding fashion editors), covering your toes would be tantamount to a dress code infraction. For everyone in between, workplace policy can clarify matters quickly, as was the case last year when the City of Vaughan banned flip-flops among its office staff, much to the chagrin of its sandal-sporting mayor, Linda Jackson (better known lately for scandals than sandals). Provincial employees have more foot-flashing leeway: in 2007, Dalton McGuinty OK’d a casual code as part of a green initiative to decrease air conditioner usage during the summer. When deciding whether to toe or not to toe, it helps to follow a few tips: spare yourself and your colleagues the sock-sandal spectacle, leave the Crocs in the garden, and if you must don flip-flops, walk with care to minimize the beachy slappity-slap. And it goes without saying that regular upkeep is a must. If you’re not willing to pedicure, keep those dogs in a cage.

Jason Klippenstein, the Annex

Wondering about the waterfront? Curious about construction? Perplexed by politics? Ask the Urban Decoder a question here.

Urban Decoder

Comments

I read somewhere that the buttons at crosswalks in New York don’t do anything. Is the same true in Toronto?

The city’s stoplight buttons haven’t been neutered to the extent of their NYC equivalents, which have been purely placebos since the emergence of computer-controlled traffic in the late ’80s. Here, whether pressing the button is productive or pointless depends mostly on which part of the city you’re in. In outlying areas, impatient pedestrians can take comfort in knowing their button pushing does not go unanswered; the busier roads often get a permanent green until a car appears or someone hits the button. But in the downtown core—south of Bloor between Bathurst and Jarvis—foot traffic is steady enough that stoplight cycles are usually pre-set, so hitting that button once, twice or 15 times in quick succession won’t bring you any closer to a green. Depending on the distance from sidewalk to sidewalk and how well trodden the intersection, the walk signal lasts between 15 and 32 seconds. These cycles can be interrupted only by streetcars, which are equipped with devices that extend the green. But lest you label the buttons totally impotent, pushing them for three seconds triggers an audio aid for the blind—cuckoos for north-south crossings and chirps for east-west—making their presence on street corners not so birdbrained after all.

• Question from Ivan Tzembelikos in Brampton

Wondering about the waterfront? Curious about construction? Perplexed by politics? Ask the Urban Decoder a question here.


Urban Decoder

1 Comment

I keep hearing that scooters are death traps, but I never read about accidents. Are they really that dangerous?

Photo by Tannis Toohey/Get Stock

Photo by Tannis Toohey/Get Stock

Motorcycle accidents are a reliable source of organ donations in North America, and until recently, scooter smash-ups in Ontario were tracked in the same category. Still, there is much anecdotal evidence to suggest that scooters are not as life threatening as their burlier big brothers. For starters, the official hipster transport vehicles are a lot less powerful than your average hog. The fact that Vespas and the like are primarily used for zipping around town rather than letting loose on the open road also helps to curb scooter crash stats. That said, not all Toronto scoot stories are Roman Holiday–esque romps. In 2007, Haydain Neale, the lead singer of the Toronto R&B band Jacksoul, was knocked from his scooter by a car at Kennedy and Eglinton. He was wearing a helmet but still sustained near-fatal head injuries that led to a six-week coma and ongoing rehab. Collisions like this are rare. The majority of accidents (often due to slippery roads or snagging a streetcar track) lead to scrapes, bruises and wounded hipster pride.

• Question from Robyn Burke in Little Italy

Wondering about the waterfront? Curious about construction? Perplexed by politics? Ask the Urban Decoder a question here.

Urban Decoder

Comments

My house backs onto a ravine. Should I be worried about a coyote mauling my toddler?

coyoteEver since Zoe the chihuahua was snatched from her yard in the Beach, the coyote has replaced Walmart as the area’s public enemy number one. To get rid of them humanely, Toronto Animal Services has employed scare tactics—paintball guns and air horns—in nearby ravines, but in the meantime, there’s no need to ban backyard fun: Zoe’s fate isn’t the norm, and unless you’re Mickey Rourke, your child probably isn’t a chihuahua. Generally speaking, coyotes approach human territory only when tempted by a food source, and even then, they aren’t likely to attack . The closest Toronto has come to coyote-human combat was in 2003, when an animal nipped four people in two North York parks. In that case, a local had been feeding the coyote cooked chicken. Understandably, the hungry canine was peeved to discover not all park-goers are packing poultry.

Question from Rochelle Armour in Hogg’s Hollow

Wondering about the waterfront? Curious about construction? Perplexed by politics? Ask the Urban Decoder a question here.

Urban Decoder

8 Comments

I’m sick of cabbies giving me the stink eye when I try to pay with Visa. Aren’t they required to take credit?

Credit cards are indeed the kryptonite of the cab world, but not without reason. Most cab companies charge employees a processing fee of about five per cent for each credit transaction, which explains why people who hop into a cab without cash are often met with either a look of disgust (as though you offered to pay for the ride with rancid cheese) or a dubious claim that the machine is broken. There’s no city bylaw requiring drivers to accept credit. Instead, policies fall to individual companies. Beck Taxi, Toronto’s largest fleet, requires all drivers to carry a manual credit card processor, in case the famously faulty electronic machines break down. What this means is that if a driver with a broken machine picks you up, lying or not, he should still be able to take your card. If you’re riding Beck (and have the guts to take on a crabby cabbie), you can inform your driver that you are aware of the policy. Dollars to doughnuts, the machine will suddenly start working.

Question from Gill Dymond in North Toronto

Wondering about the waterfront? Curious about construction? Perplexed by politics? Ask the Urban Decoder a question here.

Urban Decoder

Comments

If we can recycle paper and plastic in our blue bins, what’s with the big stink over Tim Hortons coffee cups?

City hall’s recent tirade against plastic Timmy’s lids has led many to assume that they’re the sole enviro-offenders in the coffee cup debacle. In fact, contrary to popular belief, neither the cups nor their lids are blue bin approved. Standard takeout cups are lined with a thin plastic coating, so they can’t be pulped with other paper products. And they can’t be thrown in with the plastic-coated milk cartons because the cups melt at a faster rate, making the pulp lumpy and unusable for recycled tissue paper. To handle the oddball material, paper mills would need to retrofit their facilities, and Toronto’s trash-sorting technology would require a $3-million upgrade; so far, neither Timmy’s nor the city is willing to cough up the cash. Until someone does, the 350 million cups that get tossed every year will continue to be lumped in with the Michigan-bound trash. Given Toronto’s commitment to a 70 per cent garbage diversion rate by 2011, that’s more than enough reason for the big brew-haha.

• Question from Alice Abbott in The Beach

Wondering about the waterfront? Curious about construction? Perplexed by politics? Ask the Urban Decoder a question here.

Follow Toronto Life on Twitter, Facebook and via RSS

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Most shared stories today

Advertisement