You’re half right. And you could be entitled to a refund. Under the city’s hotly debated bag bylaw, retailers of all kinds—not just grocers—are obliged to charge at least five cents for each plastic bag. Rare exceptions include bags for dry cleaning, bacteria-busting bags for meat or poultry and plastic bags at the pharmacy counter (because disguising one’s Viagra prescription is a God-given right). The rules for paper bags are more complicated. In most cases, store owners can technically charge whatever they want for a paper bag. They could charge you $20, though presumably you’d have the sense to tell them where to stick said pricey sack. The only exception under the new bag bylaw states that if a store can’t provide a five-cent plastic bag, paper bags or boxes must be free. To determine if your store committed a punishable offence, we’d have to know if there was a plastic alternative. Chances are the clerk who took your nickel was simply making a rookie mistake, but if the “fancy store” was really desperate enough to make an illegal five-cent cash grab, the economy will almost certainly exact your revenge in the near future.
• Question from Tara Roberts, Summerhill



The answer, in short, is that it won’t be for long. In April, the provincial government voted to ban all manner of hand-held gadgets behind the wheel, which includes cellphones, PDAs and electronic entertainment devices. Following the announcement of the new bylaw, which will come into effect this fall, Car and Driver magazine released a study that compared the length of time it takes to brake when sober, when texting and when drunk. The results: 0.04 extra seconds before hitting the brakes while drunk, versus 0.68 seconds for a texting driver (at standard highway speeds, this translates to a difference of 66 feet). Such findings are particularly unnerving, given the prevalence of the practice; an American survey found that 25 per cent of motorists admitted to DWT, and the figure leaps to almost 60 per cent for drivers between 16 and 19 years old. Circumstantial evidence further supports the new law: this summer, a Hamilton man ran his car into a median and then a tree while texting. Safe to say he’s not LOLing now.