-
-
Is it just us, or does this frock look a little, well, frumpy? And cheap? Of course, given that it’s Lanvin, it probably cost more than our last mortgage payment, but the way the material bunches just looks a little Le Château. And the length is rather unflattering. Nice blowout, though.
-
-
We know we’re going to take heat for this, but the only word to describe this ensemble is “heinous” (unless she’s popping by a toga party in hell on her way from the premiere). What’s the point of hours at the gym when she’s just going to drape herself in fabric? We’re sure her breasts are in there somewhere. Add an old lady up-do and inexplicable vampy lips, and we’re having trouble even remembering the fresh-faced fashion plate we know and love.
-
-
There’s a big difference between bad fashion and personal preference. Personally, we find the whole plunging-neckline-exposed-side-boob look to be a bit J-Lo circa 1999, but the overall effect is fresh, stylish and age appropriate. Suno is one of the hottest designers out of NYC right now. Not sure why Rachel pulled out her prom shoes to wear with such a hip outfit, but they’re a lot better than what this other girl’s got on.
-
-
At last—a fashionable hole in one! The olive colour is perfect, the leather fabric is flirty, and the fit is beyond reproach. All in all, one of the most flattering frock-actor combinations since Hilary Swank went backless. Love the shoes (no one does strappy like Michael Kors), love the hair, love the lipstick. And best of all, the look can be yours for about $455. All’s forgiven.
-
-
Another five-star fashion effort. Here, we return to the matter of personal preference. Besides being beautiful, this is our kind of dress: flirty, classy and slightly modish. It looks like something Twiggy would have worn back in the day. This, to us, is the ultimate seal of sartorial approval.