
(Images: George Pimentel)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
HOME May 25, 2012 The Magazine | Digital Edition | Subscribe | Newsletters | Contests | Mobile App
Advertisement
A compendium of the latest store openings, hottest parties and runway shows and all the buzzy fashion gossip. Sign up for the Style newsletter for weekly updates
Neither the author nor Toronto Life necessarily agrees with the comments posted here. Editors will not correct spelling or grammar. Toronto Life reserves the right to edit or delete comments entirely. Read our full policy
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
© 2012. All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part strictly prohibited. Toronto Life is a registered trademark of Toronto Life Publishing Company Limited
LMAO, Suzanne Rogers even with all her husband’s money wears whatever she wants and it’s still mostly aweful?
June 13, 2011 at 11:23 pm | by FashiongalThis person is not a reason to “love” Toronto. Although, it could be a good example in a feature titled “What Not To Love About Botox.”
June 15, 2011 at 8:29 am | by L.L.Full marks to her for supporting charities and maintaining her appearance.
June 15, 2011 at 1:16 pm | by 10izboyI’ll assume she’s a lovely person. That doesn’t make her special or any reason to love Toronto. In fact, to the rest of the country, it would probably be the opposite.
I don’t really care about her “charity work”. She’s an incredibly wealthy, stay-at-home mother who likely has more than one nanny. It is simply an expectation of her “position” in that circle to apply herself in that way; if you want to call it “charity work” when you put on a $10,000 dress and get your friends to donate a few hundred dollars to the cause of the day. It’s not like she’s working with families stricken by AIDS in Africa. Or even bringing general awareness of a social problem to the average person, since the average person isn’t attending expensive charity balls.
I’m glad she wears whatever she wants. As she should. As for her style….I’m not convinced it merits this level of fawning (cf The Coveteur). Her southern belle hairstyle alone detracts from whatever “style” is evidenced by her outfits, and she does need to spend way less time with her cosmetic dermatologist and/or plastic surgeon. Then I might respect her “style” a bit more and better understand the obsession Toronto Life and TL Fashion seem to have with her.
June 15, 2011 at 7:14 pm | by ShopperThe hairstyle?late 80′s debacle
June 15, 2011 at 7:29 pm | by nicolethe face? a Middleton clinic exercise in what not to do.
Charity? when she cleanses her face,dons less couture fashion and walks in a haitian street with orphans…maybe then i will applaud
a reason to love toronto?outside of her rarified circle and the fawning pages of TL …………..other than the over billed customers of her husband who really knows this dame?
Yawn. It is interesting how Toronto Life has recycled every old photograph of Suzanne and have used it every time they talk about her..really? Is that your point here? Really getting stale and you are too obvious in your motives..I think you’ve done about 10 pieces on this woman with all the same photos..I’ve seen unbelievable photos of this woman and interestingly you have never used them..Anytime I have seen Rogers out in the past 2 years she has been dressed amazing and her personal style is fabulous.Any credible article written about her uses up the date photos and talks about her in a very positive way. It is ONLY Toronto Life that sinks to this tabloid trash and opens up an blackboard to losers to write jealous and envy fueled comments…anonymously. All other writers who have written about Suzanne actually put their name to their articles.
Rogers is a very attractive woman, wealthy, a woman who is known internationally for her style positively (hair and all..) and an amazing mother and supporter of various good causes in the city
I guess really having “it all’ really pisses off alot op people…
June 16, 2011 at 2:15 pm | by ES