HOME  |  March 12, 2010  |  Blogs: The Dish, The Goods, The Hype and The Informer

My Toronto Life: Sign In  |  Register  |  Contests  |  Subscribe

Toronto Life

advertisement indicator
Toronto Life - The Wire

The comprehensive index of every blog post, magazine story and restaurant review that appears on Torontolife.com

Spectator

In defence of Mark Steyn

A couple of weeks ago, I reported in this space about Mark Steyn’s appearance at Indigo’s Bay and Bloor store, during which Heather Reisman interviewed him. I suggested the event might better have been titled “White Guys’ Night Out” or some such, and played it mostly for laughs. The story picked up again yesterday, when the National Post featured an op-ed by left-coast writer Terry O’Neill on the subject of Macleans’—and by extension, Mark Steyn’s—upcoming trial before the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal (a discrimination complaint brought “on behalf of Muslim residents in the province of British Columbia” that will be heard on June 2). O’Neill reminds us that when you defend free speech, you’re doing it for everyone. Or, in the words of Noam Chomsky: “If we don’t believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don’t believe in it at all.”

In this case, O’Neill observes that the B.C. commission developed the way it did in order to combat the likes of the late Doug Collins, a virulently offensive, arguably anti-Semitic columnist for North Shore News, a Vancouver community newspaper. He quotes Robert Fulford, opining that Collins “played to a particularly odious gallery. If he was not a Holocaust denier, he was certainly a Holocaust trivializer.” To wit, Collins referred to Schindler’s List as “Swindler’s List.”

Collins died in 2001 and the cases brought against him more or less died with him. His legacy is the commission’s terms of reference regarding speech that, writes O’Neill, make “it an offence to publish anything that so much as ‘indicates discrimination’ or ‘is likely to expose’ to discrimination someone from a protected group. Writers can be convicted even if no actual discrimination resulted and even if what they wrote was true.”

This, not to put too fine a point on it, is nuts. A fellow journo covering the Garth Drabinsky trial this morning said it best. “I hate those guys. They’re forcing me to defend Mark Steyn.” And so should we all. On serious issues of race and pluralism, Steyn is glib and simplistic. But the fact is he’s also funny and effective, which puts him in a whole other league from some tattooed cracker with a megaphone. Come June 2, one hopes saner heads prevail.

The original Bete Noire [National Post]

Comments

Comment on this post

Neither the author nor Toronto Life necessarily agree with the comments posted below. Editors will not correct spelling or grammar. Toronto Life reserves the right to edit or delete comments entirely. Read our full policy

 

Follow Toronto Life on Twitter, Facebook and via RSS

advertisement indicator
advertisement indicator

TODAY IN TORONTO has moved to our new culture and entertainment blog, The Hype. Look for it every morning here

Special messages from our partners Toronto Life and Yellow Pages Wedding Guide 2010. Click here for Perfect Escapes Click here to view the full Private Schools Directory Click here to view the Home Renovation Guide Click to search careers on Toronto Life. Powered by Career Builder Canada
advertisement indicator