Advertisement

Toronto Life - The Dish

The latest restaurant buzz, including what’s opening, what’s closing, and where to eat, drink and be seen

Bottoms Up

3 Comments

Drunken logic: new tax on Ontario wine meant to raise sales of Ontario wine

A taxing situation hits Ontario wine sales (Image: Derek Purdy)

In its far-reaching attempts to promote fully local Ontario wine, as opposed to partially local blended plonk, the provincial government has left no stone unturned: an aggressive pro-VQA marketing campaign to clear up the confusing “Cellared in Canada” labels, and now, contradictory logic. A new tax on blended wine that will go into effect on July 1, equating roughly 62 cents on an $8 bottle, is intended to nudge customers into buying more expensive wines, like VQA selections, which cost around $14 a bottle. In other words, the government is hoping that the stinginess of wine customers will motivate them to buy pricier wine.

Those able to resist the temptation to spend an extra $6 will still be helping the local wine industry, as revenue from the tax will be funnelled back into promoting Ontario vineyards.

Critics of the move have noted the obvious: that a tax on blended wine, which contains a minimum of 30 per cent local content, will merely result in customers buying cheaper, completely foreign wine, like Fuzion. “It will be catastrophic,” two of Canada’s largest wineries declared in a letter to grape growers in February.

Aren’t environmental bragging rights enough to prompt people to buy local? Oh, right.

New tax on cheap wine puts Ontario vintners in a sour mood [Globe and Mail]

3 Comments

Comment on this post

  1. Are you buying the big wineries’ spin?! They will not stop making blended wines — too profitable! The tax only applies to CIC wines sold through their private stores (vineyards, wine rack) — which they get as a privilege. If they want to sell blended stuff through those stores, why not pay extra for that privilege — they could just sell VQA in those stores. Too many unfair advantages for big wineries. Just sabre-rattling on their part. Pay no attention!

    April 20, 2010 at 7:05 am | by Goofball
  2. Of course, the big joke is that wine containing only 30% Canadian content is even called “Canadian wine”!

    April 24, 2010 at 9:25 am | by IanReece
  3. If the Government wants us to buy more local wine than lower the price, I’m not willing to pay $15 for Ontario wine that isnt as good as $10 foreign.

    if Ontario was cheaper I’d buy more and sales will increase, and cover the loss on the price.

    Simple economics

    April 29, 2010 at 11:49 am | by Rob

Comment on this post

Neither the author nor Toronto Life necessarily agrees with the comments posted here. Editors will not correct spelling or grammar. Toronto Life reserves the right to edit or delete comments entirely. Read our full policy

 

Follow Toronto Life on Twitter, Facebook and via RSS

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Most shared stories today

Advertisement