Latest Posts
- Notice to “Spectator” readers
- So Long. Farewell. Auf wiedersehen. Goodbye.
- Magazine maven Bonnie Fuller poised to market her toughest brand yet: Herself
- John Macfarlane grabs The Walrus’s tiller
Tools
Categories
- General
- Bay Street
- Black Watch
- Television
- Radio
- Internet
- Newspapers
- Gossip Hound
- Egos
- Across the Ocean
- Over the Border
- Books
- Magazines
- American Election
- New York Times vs Wall Street Journal
- Gaffe of the Week
- Livent Trial
Postings by date
Jim Himes provides much-need realism, free beer
Posted on March 28, 2008 by Douglas Bell
It’s 8:30 p.m. in Stamford, Connecticut, and the reclamation of America is progressing one stultifying trivia question at a time. Forty-something Jim Himes—slim, energetic, whip smart, democratic and electable—is running for Congress in the Connecticut 4th District. He needs support and money, and what better way to find those than by sponsoring (with free beer and pizza) a pub trivia night upstairs at Bradford’s, an ersatz pub on a twee shopping drag. If you happen to know who went on from the Governor’s mansion in Hartford to become U.S. ambassador to India then, buddy, your night is made. Mine, not so much.
Connecticut political trivia notwithstanding, I learned a couple of things that night. First, Connecticut, despite what it says on the license plates about it being the Constitution State, is, in fact, the nutmeg state. Second, Jim Himes (Rhodes Scholar, Goldman Sachs VP turned affordable housing maven, and licensed shell fisherman) is pissed off and righteous. In a time when wry detachment is meant to be the political currency of the moment (or so Neal Gabler tells us in Wednesday’s New York Times), Himes is serious and earnest and my sense is that he actually gives a shit.
But he doesn’t give a shit the way, say, an activist or an advocate gives a shit. If he gets elected he has to govern, and that means he doesn’t have the luxury of moral victories. That’s why when I asked him, eyeball to eyeball, how he was going to legislate habeas corpus back into existence and end the war, he didn’t give me one of those “thank God we’re on the same team” looks. Rather, he stopped, thought about the question, and then said straight up: “Six months ago, people were talking about that stuff—the war, civil rights. Now three-quarters of the people I talk to are terrified by the economy, and it’s the advocates that are keeping the issues you’re talking about alive.” In short, Himes is a realist, and as much as he talks about “restoring the values that made this country great so that everybody gets a crack at the American dream” (American politicians really say that sort of thing, even in private), he has to get elected first—this means tailoring his message to an electorate scared by their skyrocketing mortgage payments and credit card bills.
In pursuit of the brass ring, Himes is running against 11-term incumbent Chris Shays—the last Republican congressman in New England. Shays is a “moderate” who supports the war and is counting to some extent on receiving former Democratic VP candidate Joe Lieberman’s endorsement, thereby driving “moderate” Democrats across the aisle. On the other side, Himes has forged a coalition of progressives, many of whom supported Ned Lamont in his failed effort to unseat Lieberman and actively oppose the war and its various manifestations. If pub night is any indication, their enthusiasm for Himes knows few bounds. Half the people I spoke to seemed to be writing lefty blogs supporting Himes and/or his agenda (my favourite: Myleftnutmeg.com). Himes’ progressive bona fides were topped off by the fact that his wife is Canadian—a fact that seems, among left-leaning Connecticut Yankees at least, a simulacrum for fellow traveller.
• My Left Nutmeg
• The Maverick and the Media [New York Times]
- Back to Spectator Home
- Categories: General, Internet, Over the Border
- Permalink





Comments
Neither the author nor Toronto Life necessarily agree with the comments posted below. Editors will not correct spelling or grammar. Toronto Life reserves the right to edit or delete comments entirely. Read our full policy
You must register to post comments. Please register here.
Lit_200 March 28, 2008 at 4:48 p.m.
Nice bit of writing from Mr Bell, describing the ways of even attractive politicos, saying, in effect: "the questions you raise are old hat, we have more immediate concerns today." In other words, mortgage woes trump habeas corpus.
In fact, for those who are losing their homes, or fear losing their homes (a lot of people), that's by far a more urgent issue than the loss of civil rights.
That's the soft underbelly of representative democracies, isn't it? Politicians have an event horizon defined by their voters before an election, and a time frame defined after an election by whenever they have to face the electorate again.
Post a comment