Latest Posts
- White men cheer for Mark Steyn at Bay and Bloor
- Signs of the times
- New York’s newspaper war shifts its battleground from Manhattan to Myanmar
- Conrad Black’s legal tormentor gets new job, salary bump
Tools
Categories
- General
- Bay Street
- Black Watch
- Television
- Radio
- Internet
- Newspapers
- Gossip Hound
- Egos
- Across the Ocean
- Over the Border
- Books
- Magazines
- American Election
- New York Times vs Wall Street Journal
- Gaffe of the Week
Postings by date
How to change the Wall Street Journal without pissing off bankers
Posted on March 25, 2008 by Douglas Bell
The battle for the hearts and minds of New York newspaper readers (and every other elite reader in North America) was further joined yesterday as the Times reported on the ongoing efforts at the Journal to cut the Times’ grass: “The Wall Street Journal’s transition to more breaking news and shorter articles will continue in the coming weeks with a make-over of its Marketplace section.”
It’s all part of the rethinking and re-engineering that’s been under way ever since Murdoch bought the paper last fall—more general interest news, more politics, shorter, snappier stories accompanied by a reduced emphasis on long investigative pieces and offbeat features.
And yet, as yesterday’s Journal demonstrated, the paper is still capable of journalism in those categories that’s light years ahead of the competition. Two terrific long-form cover stories appeared, one offbeat (how bamboo is ravaging American gardens) and one in-depth (a reconsideration of the Malthusian dilemma—too many people, too few resources). All of which points to the difficulty of the task Murdoch has set his editors: change the greatest business paper on earth without pissing off its core constituency.
Still, as one Timesman said to me when I asked how he handicapped the race, “They’ve got 60 billion bucks. We’ve got three billion… I don’t see it ending well for us.”
• Call the Pandas: Bamboo Engulfs Defenseless Yards [Wall Street Journal]
• New Limits to Growth Renew Malthusian Fears [Wall Street Journal]
• Wall St. Journal to Make Over Popular Section [New York Times]
Comments
Neither the author nor Toronto Life necessarily agree with the comments posted below. Editors will not correct spelling or grammar. Toronto Life reserves the right to edit or delete comments entirely. Read our full policy
You must register to post comments. Please register here.
Lit_200 March 25, 2008 at 2:12 p.m.
Murdoch should cherish what he's bought. Offbeat stories and in-depth features are a large part of the WSJ's strong appeal and I love 'em both. I particularly like renewed fears that Malthus was not wrong after all, just 100 years early. And bamboo! Who would have thought? There are two big stands of bamboo in the property where I live and they are great — make a click-click sound in the wind that I like and they are just nice to look at. If we made better use of bamboo, they wouldn't be such a problem. As travelers know, exterior scaffolding made of bamboo is used to construct the tallest skyscrapers in Hong Kong and China.
If newspapers are to survive, the owners have to put more, not less, money into in-depth and offbeat articles.
Post a comment