Spectator

Is Martin Newland’s freshly launched paper The Guardian or Pravda? They report, you decide

Posted on April 18, 2008 by Douglas Bell


image for Is Martin Newland’s freshly launched paper The Guardian or Pravda? They report, you decide
From Thenational.ae

Martin Newland, Ken Whyte’s former deputy honcho at the National Post and head honcho at The Daily Telegraph during the reign of Lord Black of Coleman FCI, is starting up the latest thing: a big-time daily newspaper financed by United Arab Emirates petro-dollars. The Times of London reports that:

He has assembled an editorial staff of about 200, many of them former employees of The Telegraph, including Colin Randall, ex-Paris correspondent who has become The National’s executive editor.

Other hires include deputy editor Hassan Fattah, of The New York Times, and Sue Ryan, Bob Cowan, Alan Philps and James Langton, all ex-journalists from The Telegraph.

Joining this august roster are scads of Canadians to man the bridge in Abu Dhabi, including former CBCer Matt Kwong, Star types Matthew Chung and Jen Gerson, ex-Postie Rob McKenzie and former Montreal Gazette foreign editor Ray Beauchemin. The National’s Web site features a photo of former National Post news presentation editor Laura Koot’s thumb accompanied by the cutline “Laura Koot, the art director, presses a button to send the Arts and Life section to the presses for the first time on April 16, 2008.”

Newland goes around saying this will be the last great newspaper launch in our lifetime, and he’s probably right on that. With the Emirates’ $850-billion sovereign fund as treasury, the whole project should be a wild ride. As for the project itself, well, as the link below demonstrates, this newspaper looks and reads a bit like The Guardian. Only not.

But don’t take my word for that “only not” bit. Here it is neatly summarized from the desk of Martin Newland:

Understand now that we are not here to fight for press freedom—to get yarns about money laundering under the state radar. We are here to produce a professional, commercially viable newspaper. Press freedom is a by-product of this. The more we zero in on templated “red line” stories at the expense of human interest and the ordinary narrative of life in the UAE, the more we look like a foreign newspaper, peering into the goldfish bowl…

I can tell you now that every application from a journalist wanting to come and work here who has included in his or her portfolio an “investigative” piece about labourers’ living standards has gone straight in the bin. Not because the theme is unworthy—it is and we will do it—but because we are looking for other, more nuanced and mature avenues into the national story.

Even at that, Newland will have to walk a fine line between whatever it is he’s trying to do and the natural inclination of his founders to prefer Pravda-like consensus to, er, journalism. He should heed this harbinger from The Times of London:

Other papers have failed in the past to make an impact in the Middle East. Two years ago, Frank Kane, formerly The Observer’s business editor, was hired by Andrew Neil, a former editor of The Sunday Times, to help set up The Financial Times in the region.

However, tensions between the editors and its government proprietors ended in the lifting of its licence before the launch.

Now that Newland has actually launched a newspaper in this context, how it will do remains to be seen. Still, to get as far as he has must have taken some real chutzpah.

I put all this to Newland directly particularly the stuff about Frank Kane. Newland was the soul of candour in response: "Frank is a good man and I am tired of talking about censorship. It may claim me, who knows, unlikely. But this will always have been worth doing and the UAE is lovely."

The National
10 things you should know about...The National [Kip Report]
Ex Telegraph editor launches Abu Dhabi daily [The Times]
Hire Power [Toronto Life]
Actual journalists need not apply [Dubai Media]
The making of The National [The National]
Abu Dhabi Starts Journal Rival as It Censors Papers (Update1) [Bloomberg]
A new newspaper! [Montreal Gazette]

Comments

Neither the author nor Toronto Life necessarily agree with the comments posted below. Editors will not correct spelling or grammar. Toronto Life reserves the right to edit or delete comments entirely. Read our full policy

You must register to post comments. Please register here.

charley April 19, 2008 at 1:25 p.m.

Very scary take re the future of newspapers-unlimited funds and definite tendentious political and social agenda. Oh well, I guess I don't have to read it. Although I imagine like when the National Post started up curiosity got the better of me and I read several issues.

GravityLevity2 April 19, 2008 at 2:46 p.m.

Newland knows a couple, former colleagues and very dear friends of his, who are seasoned columnists, with international profiles, presently resident in the US, who probably consider themselves underemployed.
Will his new rag be using columns from either or both of them?

leaf April 19, 2008 at 3:48 p.m.

yes GL2

charley April 20, 2008 at 10:13 p.m.

Going back to Douglas Bell's question-will this paper be more like Guardian or Pravda- actually it seems it will be more like my local Southern Ontario weekly- a "commercially viable" paper that eschews "investigative pieces about employees' living standards" in favour of "human interest stories". No comforting the afflicted or afflicting the comfortable likely on the cards here!Whenever a fresh out of journalism school reporter on our local paper starts getting too concerned about some malfeasance by town council or area business (i.e. advertiser!)that reporter is soon out of work....

Lit_200 April 21, 2008 at 2:11 a.m.

To add even more confusion:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/21/busine...

Lit_200 April 21, 2008 at 8:24 a.m.

Sounds like the new rag will purvey "All the news that's fit... to please big money."

leaf April 21, 2008 at 11:16 a.m.

une feuille demande à littérature deux cents de lui écrire dans les plus brefs délais

JenG April 26, 2008 at 2:49 a.m.

The best piece of journalistic advice I have ever received came from an ex. He said: "Haters gonna hate. Playas gonna play. Don't hate the player, hate the game."

One need only to look at The National to see that it is not Pravda. Neither is it the New York Times. It probably will never be, just as the Middle East will probably never be a true democracy. But that doesn't mean we can't improve the system, or that our efforts are futile.

As an idealistic young journalist, tell me, is it better to work in a free country, chasing the families of yet another terrible violence, or writing articles pandering to the lost Generation Y of newspaper readers? Or is it better to work some place where the working is hard, where every slow and small victory for transparency and press freedom means something? Where you can actually make a difference, or try?

Barbara_in_BC April 26, 2008 at 4:45 p.m.

JenG asked:

"is it better to work some place where the working is hard, where every slow and small victory for transparency and press freedom means something?"

I gather you're talking about real journalists infiltrating CNN and Fox news? It would be great!

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment: