Preville on Politics
Life without appliances
Posted on May 30, 2007 by Philip Preville
As I write in the confines of my basement office, directly above my head a contractor is ripping my kitchen apart, preparing to lay down a new floor and install new plumbing, wiring, cabinets and appliances. For three days now, I have been without any sort of stove or oven and have no running water on the ground floor. I feel a little bit like the urban experimenters at spacing.ca, who do things like walk downtown from the airport: I’m doing something that runs counter to basic social convention. It has already become an apprenticeship in healthy, eco-friendly living. I wonder how long I’ll last.
I’m using considerably less water than usual, and far less energy, since I can’t cook anything. When you can’t cook, you are suddenly confronted with a choice between extremes: eat lots of fresh fruits and vegetables, or eat lots of shelf-stable junk food. Interestingly, with the latter option, the compost bin stays empty while the trash can fills up fast with non-recyclable plastic and foil packaging. Also, my grocery bills shoot through the roof. The experience has reawakened me to my own waste stream, financial and otherwise.
It has also caused me to question energy use. Back in the February 3 edition of the Globe, in a visual feature on greening your home, Martin Middlestaedt gave some of the worst environmental advice I’ve ever read: “avoid the oven—pressure cookers, microwaves and toasters use up a lot less energy and can save up to 80% on your bills.” I raise this now because it has stuck in my craw since the moment I read it. Maybe he understands something I do not, but I object on many levels. First: yes, it’s true, it takes less energy to toast bread with a toaster than a broiler. But toasters, like electric kettles, are energy pigs: electrical energy does not transfer efficiently into pure heat, which is what both these appliances try to do, and anyway it’s foolish to suggest that a toaster can be a substitute for an oven. The real solution is to stop toasting bread. Second: is it not true that the more appliances you own, the more energy you use? The last three days have certainly taught me that you don’t use appliances you don’t have, and you learn to cope. Third: the microwave is an energy saver? Huh? In my experience, most people use it for popcorn or for defrosting, which is surely a mortal environmental sin, because it is pure convenience energy. For the last four years, including the last 17 months with baby, I have lived successfully without a microwave. Friends wonder how on earth we manage, but we don’t eat popcorn, we take stuff out of the freezer in the morning before leaving for work, and we re-heat soup on the stovetop at low heat (just like mom used to make!).
Now, here’s the unfortunate and embarrassing kicker to this meditation: our new kitchen, when finished, will feature lots and lots of electrical outlets as well as a dedicated space for a microwave oven. They are choices we’ve made to protect the resale value of our home, because that’s what sells. I try not to think of it as facilitating energy consumption or waste. I prefer to think of it as a technologically adaptable kitchen, ready to service the latest, most energy-efficient lifestyle aids.
Post a comment
Philip Preville
Veteran freelance writer Philip Preville lived much of his life in Montreal and Edmonton before he was lured, like so many Torontonians before him, by the promise of more work and a better living. A National Magazine Award winner and former Canadian Journalism Fellow at the University of Toronto’s Massey College, Preville writes Toronto Life’s politics column. He lives with his wife and one-year-old son in Riverdale, just close enough to the Don Valley Parkway that he can hear it when he steps outside his house—but just far enough away that it doesn’t keep him awake at night. On his office wall hangs a 1938–39 press pass belonging to his grandfather, Elias Gannon, who wrote for the Montreal Star.
Latest blog entries:
- I have a new home
- Montreal to adopt vacuum waste collection
- Why U.S.-based magazines hit newsstands so late
- I salivate at the prospect of a Miller-Smitherman-Ford cage match





Comments
Neither the author nor Toronto Life necessarily agree with the comments posted below. Editors will not correct spelling or grammar. Toronto Life reserves the right to edit or delete comments entirely. Read our full policy
Carnot, Kelvin, et al. June 15, 2007 at 12:58 a.m.
All I have to say is wow! You really, really, really need to stop talking about the environment since you obviously don't understand thermodynamics, electricity, economics, etc.
Firstly, electricity is an excellent form of energy to convert into heat. Using electricity to do anything else is wasteful to some extent (see the heat generated by computers, incandescent or halogen light bulds, refrigerators...) as is using every form of energy to do any sort of work (i.e. 2nd law of Thermodynamics). But to create a small amount of heat it is ideal, especially in Ontario if you're worried about CO2 given how our electricity is generated. Heating homes with electricity has other issues involving the base load - we would use simply huge amounts in winter that would go unused 6-8 months of the year - but for a specific application like cooking it works well.
Carnot, Kelvin, et al. June 15, 2007 at 12:59 a.m.
Secondly, microwaves are very efficient compared with a stove: the energy is concentrated in substances containing water and substantially all of the energy is converted into heat in the target. No need to heat up a pot and very little is wasted heating up the room like with a stove.
Third: a pressure cooker wastes much less heat than a stove, since the heat applied to the water isn't wasted once it gets to 100C.
Fourth: in most applications, a specific appliance will use much less energy than a general one, since it can be designed with that one job in mind. Appliances without clocks or remote controls draw no power when they aren't on, and nearly all kitchen appliances (except for the microwave and maybe the coffee maker) tend to be unplugged and hidden away when not in use. A stove will use much more energy to make coffee than a coffee maker will since the elements can be very small and situated ideally in the coffee maker instead of a large heat source like even the small burner on a stove.
Carnot, Kelvin, et al. June 15, 2007 at 12:59 a.m.
Live like Woody Harrelson on the raw food diet if you like, but please, please, please get your facts straight. If you are going to be following political issues that are science heavy, like, oh, absolutely every urban issue except for dog parks, you DESPERATELY need to work on your science, engineering, and economics background. Talk to some engineering professors at U of T for reading lists on statistics, engineering economics, thermodynamics, chemistry, fluid mechanics, and structures to begin with.
Finally, um why would you be embarrassed about HAVING outlets? You can only run so many appliances off of a given circuit without tripping a breaker, so the number of outlets has no impact on your use of electricity. The size of your connection and the number of breakers in your panel will have some effect, but even that is limited by the various connections between your house and the transformer. It's very hard to draw more maximum power than your neighbours, but you can have higher or lower averages. None of this is really impacted by the number of outlets, just by your use. If you are really worried, install some solar panels rather than reducing the number of outlets!